🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid first step," commented one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and fit for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, further countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.